ARTEMIDE-01
Clinician commentary on ARTEMIDE-01 in the sources reviewed for this edition leads to one open question: What confirmatory evidence would establish clinically meaningful, PD-L1-specific benefit while resolving post-CPI activity and TIGIT-class doubts? Its leading findings: (1) the favorable CPI-naive reading is concentrated in PD-L1-high disease and remains provisional. (2) low post-CPI response activity receives sharply different interpretations. (3) whether rilvegostomig can validate TIGIT remains an explicit controversy. 4 more findings follow. 32 sources screened, 16 cited; not all HCPs or all public discussion.
- NCT04995523 ↗
- v1.0.0 · edition 1
- updated Oct 29, 2026
- Focused
7 findings, and what sits behind each
01. The favorable CPI-naive reading is concentrated in PD-L1-high disease and remains provisional
5 statements · 6 passages · 5 sources · 4 named voices
Counterview: recorded · Limitations recorded: 2. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Population and setting, Secondary endpoints, Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Primary endpoint: Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters, Safety and tolerability.
02. Low post-CPI response activity receives sharply different interpretations
7 statements · 8 passages · 5 sources · 4 named voices
Counterview: recorded · Limitations recorded: 3. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Population and setting, Primary endpoint: Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters, Safety and tolerability, Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Secondary endpoints.
03. Whether rilvegostomig can validate TIGIT remains an explicit controversy
6 statements · 4 passages · 4 sources · 4 named voices
Counterview: recorded · Limitations recorded: 3. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
04. Cooperative binding and reduced Fc activity are proposed explanations, not demonstrated clinical advantages
9 statements · 5 passages · 3 sources · 2 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 3. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
05. Favorable safety language requires cohort-specific severity and uncertainty
7 statements · 9 passages · 5 sources · 4 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 2. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Primary endpoint: Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters, Safety and tolerability, Population and setting, Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Secondary endpoints.
06. A speaker’s methodological endorsement concerns efficient dose selection, not comparative efficacy
6 statements · 6 passages · 2 sources · 1 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 3. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Design and conduct, Secondary endpoints.
07. The patient-facing eligibility summary leaves prior-immunotherapy requirements unresolved
4 statements · 3 passages · 2 sources · 0 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 2. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Population and setting, The comparison.
Counts overlap, since one statement can back several findings. They show what the report kept, not how many clinicians agree. The full report includes the interpretations and source links.
Select a finding to see what the full report holds for it: how many verified HCP statements and of what kind, the passages behind them, the sources and voices, and the counterview and limits it records. Select a part of the trial to see which findings draw on it.
- Finding 1 of 7
The favorable CPI-naive reading is concentrated in PD-L1-high disease and remains provisional
- statements
- 5
- passages
- 6
- sources
- 5
- named voices
- 4
What the statements areViews 4Questions and uncertainty 0Clinical experience 0Comparisons 0Restated results and context 1How passages are usedSupporting a statement 6Giving context 0Recorded with the finding- Counterview: recorded
- Limitations: 2
- Feeds the Medical Affairs question
- 4 posts and articles
- 1 publication
Draws on: Population and setting, Secondary endpoints, Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Primary endpoint: Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters, Safety and tolerability.
In the full report: the interpretation in full, all 5 statements cited to source and date, and the 5 sources linked where public.
Thicker lines mean more shared statements. A finding without a line goes beyond the registered design. Counts overlap, since one statement can back several findings, and they show what the report kept, not how many clinicians agree.
The full ARTEMIDE-01 report gives each finding its interpretation, the attributed views behind it, counterviews, limits and the verified HCP statements, each linked to the original. Get a complete report free to see what you get.
What confirmatory evidence would establish clinically meaningful, PD-L1-specific benefit while resolving post-CPI activity and TIGIT-class doubts?
Raised by the leading finding. The report shows what clinicians said and the sources behind it; it does not settle the question.
By the numbers
free- 32HCP commentary sources screened
- 16sources cited by verified HCP statements
- 10found in screened sources
- 10voices cited in the report
- 9cited voices matched to verified clinician profiles
Also in the sources: 4 organizational or shared accounts, not counted as people.
- 53verified statements, each linked to its source
- 10of them from speakers with a confirmed clinical role
- 7findings
Screened sources were retrieved for this trial. Cited sources back at least one verified statement and include primary sources used for context. No count estimates how many clinicians hold a view. Size (Focused) is set by the 53 verified statements. Statements from sponsors, hosts and organisations are labelled and count apart from identified clinicians. A confirmed clinical role is one verified by the NPI registry or by the person's own institution's staff page; a role a source only states is not counted.
What's inside
free| Section | Items | Access |
|---|---|---|
| Findings with interpretation, counterviews and limits | 7 | Titles free |
| Detailed analysis | 8 sections | Paid |
| Verified statements with short source quotes and links | 53 | Paid |
| Trial aspects mapped | 12 | Free |
| Sources with links | 16 | Counts free |
| Speaker attribution for cited voices | 10 | Paid |
Trial aspects
11 discussed · 1 no commentary · 0 incomplete| Aspect | Statements | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Primary endpoint: Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters | 5 | 5 |
| Primary endpoint: Rate of rilvegostomig discontinuation due to toxicityno commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 4 | 3 |
| Secondary endpoints | 6 | 5 |
| Population and setting | 9 | 8 |
| The comparison | 1 | 1 |
| Safety and tolerability | 5 | 5 |
| Design and conduct | 2 | 1 |
| TIGIT viability and proposed bispecific/Fc differentiation | 9 | 6 |
| Interpretation of the 2023 AZD2936/rilvegostomig response pattern | 5 | 4 |
| Further Phase III and ADC-combination development versus established clinical use | 3 | 3 |
| Organizational enthusiasm and ownership of reported views | 4 | 3 |
An aspect marked incomplete is a question the public commentary did not let us answer. We show it rather than hide it.
Sources
free| Channel | Screened | Cited | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X threads | 27 | 13 | |
| Bluesky threads | 3 | 0 | |
| LinkedIn posts | 1 | 1 | |
| YouTube | 1 | 1 | |
| Primary sources, cited for context, not screened | |||
| Publications | not screened | 1 | |
max 8 / quarter
- Screened window
- Jun 4, 2023 → Oct 26, 2026
- Cited window
- Jun 4, 2023 → Aug 14, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 29, 2026
The trial
from ClinicalTrials.gov- Title
- Phase I/II, Open-label, Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AZD2936 Anti-TIGIT/Anti-PD-1 Bispecific Antibody in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC
- Registry
- NCT04995523
- Study IDs
- D7020C00001 · 2023-508262-15-00 (EU CT Number) · 2021-000857-23
- Sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Design
- Phase 1/Phase 2 · Interventional, non randomized, sequential
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrollment
- 212 actual
- Start
- 2021-09-14 actual
- Primary completion
- 2026-08-28 estimated
- Primary endpoint
- Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) and immune mediated AEs (imAEs), serious AEs (SAEs), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), vital signs, and abnormal laboratory parameters
- Interventions
- 1 registered
Scope and limits
freeThis report does not judge efficacy, estimate HCP prevalence or consensus or give treatment advice.
- Discussion that does not name the trial may be missing from this edition.
- 2 matching sources (2 X threads) could not be read and are not included.
- Some passages in the sources used in this report were not fully assessed for clinician views, so a view there may be missing from this edition.
- 20 statements in the sources reviewed for this edition are about other patients or topics, or only mention the trial, and are not counted.
- Further source limits: discussion that describes the trial without naming it may be incomplete; some discussion that describes the trial without naming it may be missing; sources about other trials are not included.
- The sources reviewed for this edition are a limited and uneven sample of public discussion; source totals and reposts cannot be interpreted as independent-HCP counts or the prevalence of a view.
- Some potentially relevant public posts were unavailable or incompletely assessed. Discussion that did not use recognizable trial or drug names may be missing.
- Several named authors’ clinical roles are not established. Source descriptions of credentials or trial involvement do not independently verify clinical qualifications or make trial-associated views external assessments.
- The results publication reports CPI-experienced parts A and B. CPI-naive efficacy figures in this report are presented as the figures cited by the relevant commentators, not as findings established by that publication.
- Comments from different meetings, post dates, treatment-exposure settings and data cutoffs cannot establish a change of mind or a direct efficacy comparison.
- The patient-facing video leaves contradictory prior-immunotherapy requirements unexplained and does not establish a current arm count.
- A standalone protocol and an exact AZD2936 regulatory label were not available; no regulatory position is inferred.
How reports are built and checked: Methods.
Editions and corrections
freeLast checked for new commentary Oct 29, 2026. A new or changed finding gets a new version number; added evidence alone is a smaller update. No corrections.
Cite this report
Erudio Health. ARTEMIDE-01 (NCT04995523): HCP commentary report. Edition 1, v1.0.0. Accepted Oct 29, 2026. https://www.erudio.com/reports/artemide-01-nct04995523
For your AI agent
Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot or your own agent. It previews this report through the free Erudio MCP server, tells you whether it answers your question, and orders it if you ask. Some agents ask you to confirm pasted instructions before acting; that is expected.
Help me decide whether to buy the Erudio report "ARTEMIDE-01" (NCT04995523), and buy it for me if I ask. Erudio reports cover what clinicians say in public about one clinical trial, with every verified statement linked to its source.
1. Use the free Erudio MCP server at https://mcp.erudio.com/free; it needs no sign-in. Nothing needs installing: if it is not connected in this app and you can make HTTP requests, call it directly with JSON-RPC POSTs to that URL (initialize, then tools/call), sending "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream". Call get_report_card with slug "artemide-01-04995523". If you cannot make requests, read https://www.erudio.com/reports/artemide-01-nct04995523.md instead.
2. In a few lines, tell me what the report covers: its findings, its verified statements and sources, its evidence window, what it leaves out, and the price of each product (offer). Then ask what I need it for, and say plainly whether this report answers it.
3. If I want it, ask for my work email and the product: the current edition, or 3, 6 or 12 months of weekly updates. Call create_order with report "NCT04995523", that product and email, then show me the quote and the checkout_url to pay by card. If you have a payment client for HTTP 402 payments and I agree, you can pay the pay_url instead. Nothing is charged until one is paid.
4. Once it is paid, call get_order with the status_url: it returns my license key. Then use the Erudio MCP server at https://mcp.erudio.com/mcp with the header "Authorization: Bearer <key>". Call read_report with report_id erudio-nct04995523 and sections ["all"], and summarize the findings for me with their sources. The full report is large (about 500 KB): save the response to a file and work from it rather than printing it. If you cannot, read sections ["narratives"] first, the executive summary and analysis.
When you tell me what clinicians said, give each view as theirs, with its source. Counts are the sources the report kept, not the share of clinicians who agree. Reports are not medical advice.
Keep the key private to my organization.Or read the record directly: JSON, Markdown or MCP
curl https://www.erudio.com/reports/artemide-01-nct04995523.json
curl https://www.erudio.com/reports/artemide-01-nct04995523.md
# MCP, no sign-in (https://mcp.erudio.com/free)
get_report_card({ "slug": "artemide-01-04995523" })release 43024ca6008463773f95cd085826a83041f65fa13b62aff9ddd40a8c8ffd2339