KRASCENDO 3
divarasib in resected stage II-III KRAS G12C-positive NSCLC
KRASCENDO 3 tests whether divarasib improves disease-free survival after resection of stage II–III KRAS G12C-positive non-small cell lung cancer; discussion centers on a favorable NAUTIKA1 nodal observation and the threshold for standard-care endorsement. The report cites three medical oncologists. Further questions concern NAUTIKA1’s role in additional evaluation and durable patient benefit from early-stage KRAS G12C inhibition. What postoperative evidence would justify moving from a feasibility signal to routine care?
- NCT07541170 ↗
- v1.0.0 · edition 1
- updated Nov 1, 2026
- Focused
3 findings, and what sits behind each
01. A favorable nodal observation does not amount to standard-care endorsement
2 statements · 1 passages · 1 sources · 1 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 2. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
02. NAUTIKA1 is read as a feasibility rationale for further evaluation
7 statements · 5 passages · 5 sources · 4 named voices
Counterview: recorded · Limitations recorded: 4. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Safety and tolerability.
03. Early-stage interest leaves durable patient benefit as an open question
2 statements · 2 passages · 2 sources · 2 named voices
Counterview: none recorded · Limitations recorded: 2. Feeds the Medical Affairs question.
Draws on: Population and setting.
Counts overlap, since one statement can back several findings. They show what the report kept, not how many clinicians agree. The full report includes the interpretations and source links.
Select a finding to see what the full report holds for it: how many verified HCP statements and of what kind, the passages behind them, the sources and voices, and the counterview and limits it records. Select a part of the trial to see which findings draw on it.
- Finding 1 of 3
A favorable nodal observation does not amount to standard-care endorsement
- statements
- 2
- passages
- 1
- sources
- 1
- named voices
- 1
What the statements areViews 2Questions and uncertainty 0Clinical experience 0Comparisons 0Restated results and context 0How passages are usedSupporting a statement 2Giving context 0Recorded with the finding- Counterview: none recorded
- Limitations: 2
- Feeds the Medical Affairs question
- 1 post or article
Not mapped to a part of the trial's registered design.
In the full report: the interpretation in full, all 2 statements cited to source and date, and the 1 source linked where public.
Thicker lines mean more shared statements. A finding without a line goes beyond the registered design. Counts overlap, since one statement can back several findings, and they show what the report kept, not how many clinicians agree.
The full KRASCENDO 3 report gives each finding its interpretation, the attributed views behind it, counterviews, limits and the verified HCP statements, each linked to the original. Get a complete report free to see what you get.
What postoperative evidence would justify moving from a feasibility signal to routine-care adoption?
Raised by the leading finding. The report shows what clinicians said and the sources behind it; it does not settle the question.
By the numbers
free- 14HCP commentary sources screened
- 7sources cited by verified HCP statements
- 4named in screened sources
- 4voices cited in the report
- 4cited voices matched to verified clinician profiles
Also in the sources: 2 organizational or shared accounts, not counted as people.
- 10verified statements, each linked to its source
- 4of them from speakers with a confirmed clinical role
- 3findings
Screened sources were retrieved for this trial. Cited sources back at least one verified statement and include primary sources used for context. No count estimates how many clinicians hold a view. Size (Focused) is set by the 10 verified statements. Statements from sponsors, hosts and organisations are labelled and count apart from identified clinicians. A confirmed clinical role is one verified by the NPI registry or by the person's own institution's staff page; a role a source only states is not counted.
What's inside
free| Section | Items | Access |
|---|---|---|
| Findings with interpretation, counterviews and limits | 3 | Titles free |
| Detailed analysis | 4 sections | Paid |
| Verified statements with short source quotes and links | 10 | Paid |
| Trial aspects mapped | 11 | Free |
| Sources with links | 7 | Counts free |
| Speaker attribution for cited voices | 4 | Paid |
Trial aspects
5 discussed · 6 no commentary · 0 incomplete| Aspect | Statements | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Primary endpoint: Disease-free Survival (DFS), as Determined by the Investigatorno commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Secondary endpoint: Overall Survival (OS)no commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Secondary endpoint: DFS Rates at 2 and 3 Years, as Assessed by the Investigatorno commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Secondary endpoint: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)no commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Population and setting | 1 | 1 |
| The comparisonno commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| Safety and tolerability | 2 | 2 |
| Design and conductno commentary found | 0 | 0 |
| NAUTIKA1 and the threshold for standard care | 2 | 1 |
| NAUTIKA1 feasibility as a rationale for postoperative evaluation | 4 | 3 |
| Early-stage interest and the durable-benefit question | 2 | 2 |
An aspect marked incomplete is a question the public commentary did not let us answer. We show it rather than hide it.
Sources
free| Channel | Screened | Cited | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X threads | 11 | 5 | |
| LinkedIn posts | 1 | 1 | |
| Bluesky threads | 1 | 0 | |
| YouTube | 1 | 0 | |
| Primary sources, cited for context, not screened | |||
| Registry | not screened | 1 | |
max 6 / quarter
- Screened window
- May 10, 2026 → Oct 31, 2026
- Cited window
- May 10, 2026 → Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 1, 2026
The trial
from ClinicalTrials.gov- Title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Divarasib Compared With Investigator's Choice of Immunotherapy or Observation in Patients With Resected Stage II-III KRAS G12C-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Registry
- NCT07541170
- Study IDs
- BO45885 · 2025-524263-21-00
- Sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Design
- Phase 3 · Interventional, randomized, parallel
- Status
- Recruiting
- Enrollment
- 400 estimated
- Registered
- 2026-04-21
- Start
- 2026-10-06 actual
- Primary completion
- 2032-01-31 estimated
- Primary endpoint
- Disease-free Survival (DFS), as Determined by the Investigator
- Interventions
- 3 registered
Scope and limits
freeThis report does not judge efficacy, estimate HCP prevalence or consensus or give treatment advice.
- Discussion that does not name the trial may be missing from this edition.
- Some passages in the sources used in this report were not fully assessed for clinician views, so a view there may be missing from this edition.
- 11 statements in the sources reviewed for this edition are about other patients or topics, or only mention the trial, and are not counted.
- Further source limits: discussion that describes the trial without naming it may be incomplete; some discussion that describes the trial without naming it may be missing; sources about other trials are not included.
- The views come from the sources reviewed for this edition, not a representative sample of HCP opinion. Multiple posts discuss the same NAUTIKA1 cohort and should not be counted as independent clinical evidence.
- Coverage concentrated on the trial identifier and known names. Unnamed references and different transcriptions may be missing, and several potentially relevant passages have not been fully assessed.
- No publication reporting NCT07541170 was identified, no separate protocol document was listed in the registry, and no exact divarasib regulatory label was found. These absences do not establish publication or regulatory status.
- The substantive activity, surgical-feasibility and tolerability observations concern a small neoadjuvant phase II NAUTIKA1 cohort, not randomized postoperative KRASCENDO3 outcomes.
- Some speakers' identities or clinical roles are not established in the sources used in this report; each statement is attributed only as far as its source shows.
- A speaker's statement relays another party's early-stage perspective; it should not be treated as his own regimen-specific recommendation.
How reports are built and checked: Methods.
Editions and corrections
freeLast checked for new commentary Nov 1, 2026. A new or changed finding gets a new version number; added evidence alone is a smaller update. No corrections.
Cite this report
Erudio Health. KRASCENDO 3 (NCT07541170): HCP commentary report. Edition 1, v1.0.0. Accepted Nov 1, 2026. https://www.erudio.com/reports/krascendo-3-nct07541170
For your AI agent
Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot or your own agent. It previews this report through the free Erudio MCP server, tells you whether it answers your question, and orders it if you ask. Some agents ask you to confirm pasted instructions before acting; that is expected.
Help me decide whether to buy the Erudio report "KRASCENDO 3" (NCT07541170), and buy it for me if I ask. Erudio reports cover what clinicians say in public about one clinical trial, with every verified statement linked to its source.
1. Use the free Erudio MCP server at https://mcp.erudio.com/free; it needs no sign-in. Nothing needs installing: if it is not connected in this app and you can make HTTP requests, call it directly with JSON-RPC POSTs to that URL (initialize, then tools/call), sending "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream". Call get_report_card with slug "krascendo-3-07541170". If you cannot make requests, read https://www.erudio.com/reports/krascendo-3-nct07541170.md instead.
2. In a few lines, tell me what the report covers: its findings, its verified statements and sources, its evidence window, what it leaves out, and the price of each product (offer). Then ask what I need it for, and say plainly whether this report answers it.
3. If I want it, ask for my work email and the product: the current edition, or 3, 6 or 12 months of weekly updates. Call create_order with report "NCT07541170", that product and email, then show me the quote and the checkout_url to pay by card. If you have a payment client for HTTP 402 payments and I agree, you can pay the pay_url instead. Nothing is charged until one is paid.
4. Once it is paid, call get_order with the status_url: it returns my license key. Then use the Erudio MCP server at https://mcp.erudio.com/mcp with the header "Authorization: Bearer <key>". Call read_report with report_id erudio-nct07541170 and sections ["all"], and summarize the findings for me with their sources. The full report is large (about 500 KB): save the response to a file and work from it rather than printing it. If you cannot, read sections ["narratives"] first, the executive summary and analysis.
When you tell me what clinicians said, give each view as theirs, with its source. Counts are the sources the report kept, not the share of clinicians who agree. Reports are not medical advice.
Keep the key private to my organization.Or read the record directly: JSON, Markdown or MCP
curl https://www.erudio.com/reports/krascendo-3-nct07541170.json
curl https://www.erudio.com/reports/krascendo-3-nct07541170.md
# MCP, no sign-in (https://mcp.erudio.com/free)
get_report_card({ "slug": "krascendo-3-07541170" })release dc39c00b5a8657974c595b66e62c4b8ddf958677a13946fb83cecc9a2c6d6410