Reports · for Medical education, grants and scientific communications teams
Document the practice gaps clinicians describe, with the source behind each.
Good education starts from the questions clinicians actually ask. Reports collect them with the evidence attached.
When you need it
- Writing a CME or CE needs assessment
- Preparing an educational grant request
- Planning a symposium or case-based program
Ask your agent
“From this report, list the practice questions clinicians ask that would make good learning objectives, with the source for each.”
More to ask
- “Which testing and treatment-sequencing questions come up repeatedly across reports in my therapeutic area?”
- “Draft the gap analysis section of a needs assessment, citing the public clinician questions behind each gap.”
- “Which disagreements in this report would work as a debate-format session?”
Before and after
How the work changes
Today
- Write needs assessments from literature reviews and surveys
- Struggle to show that a gap comes from clinicians themselves
- Repeat last year's topics because evidence of new needs is thin
With Erudio
- Clinician questions as stated, with links for the grant file
- Disagreements ready to become case discussions
- Works alongside ChatCME, which adds learner questions after launch
What you get
- Practice questions clinicians ask, grouped by topic
- Source-linked evidence of each gap for a needs assessment
- Topics where clinicians disagree, which make strong case discussions
Tools it calls
mcp
read_report({ "report_id": "<id>", "sections": ["findings", "aspects"] })
search({ "query": "<topic> practice question", "published_after": "<date>" })In a published report
NEONIPIGA
NCT04006262
Two NEONIPIGA findings that read as education needs: clinical versus pathological clearance, and when to test MSI/MMR.
- F1Organ preservation is compelling for selected responders, but clinical response does not settle the need for surgery
- F6Early tumor-specific testing and confirmation—not presumed MSI or a single positive biopsy—shape treatment choices
What it does not do
- It documents questions clinicians ask in public. It does not design or accredit education.
- Commercial supporters never direct the content; the evidence stays independent.
- Needs are shown with sources, not as survey-based prevalence.