Reports + MCP · for Medical insights and competitive intelligence leads
Follow your own and competitor trials, and see only what changed.
Most weeks, most trials do not change. The value is knowing which ones did, and exactly how.
When you need it
- Ongoing monitoring of pivotal and competitor trials
- Quarterly medical strategy reviews
- The months between a readout and an approval
Ask your agent
“For the trials on my watchlist, tell me which reports changed this week and summarize only what is new.”
More to ask
- “What changed in the MARS 2 report since the edition I read? Do I need to reread the whole thing?”
- “Which of my competitor's trials picked up new clinician commentary this month?”
- “Flag any finding where clinician interpretation shifted since our last brief.”
Before and after
How the work changes
Today
- Set keyword alerts that return the same posts every week
- Rebuild the whole picture before every quarterly review
- Lose track of which version of the story a deck was based on
With Erudio
- A weekly changed or no-change decision per report
- Change logs your agent reads before deciding what to reread
- Versioned editions, so every brief cites what it was based on
What you get
- A weekly answer for each trial you follow: changed or not
- What changed, by finding, with the new sources behind it
- A versioned history you can cite later
Tools it calls
mcp
list_reports({ "limit": 50 })
get_report_changes({ "report_id": "<id>", "since_edition": <n> })
read_report({ "report_id": "<id>", "sections": ["findings"] })What it does not do
- Subscribed reports are re-checked weekly. A no-change week is recorded, not skipped.
- Changes are listed by finding and aspect, so nothing is silently rewritten.
- Monitoring covers the public sources named in each report's scope.